
Considering news generation risks
I’m thinking about generating a news brief with plausible details, but I need to be cautious of hallucinating—fabricating information is a no-go. It might be useful to ask the user for specific details or offer a template for what they’d like. Given the CLI environment, I can potentially fetch web data, but I'm uncertain about the sandboxing mode. Asking the user for permission to access real results might be the best approach.Clarifying user requests
I’m considering the instruction about handling special user requests. Instead of jumping straight into action, it's better to ask a concise clarifying question: “Do you want me to write a news report based on this headline or summarize the actual group draw results?” If the user wants real results, I should ask for permission to fetch the latest standings while noting my knowledge cutoff. I could propose two options: 1) write a Chinese news article summarizing storylines, or 2) pull the real draw results and present an analysis. I'll also ask about the desired style, length, and specific details they want included.
这是个新闻标题吗?您是想:
- 基于这个题目写一篇赛事快讯/深度解读(可虚构细节会避免具体比分与分组名单),还是
- 获取真实的分组结果并做梳理与看点分析?

说明下偏好:
- 篇幅:短讯(200–300字)/ 标准稿(500–800字)/ 深度稿(1000+)
- 风格:客观快讯 / 解说口吻 / 数据分析
- 是否需要:完整分组列表、出线前景判断、关键对决/明星看点、赛程要点
如需真实结果,我可以即时查询后按您指定格式整理。
