拉波尔塔：重建诺坎普出现问题不是利马克的责任，所以没索赔（拉波尔塔：诺坎普重建问题与利马克无关，俱乐部不提出索赔）

Summarizing Camp Nou reconstruction issues

I need to respond to the user regarding their Chinese message about Laporta's statement on the Camp Nou reconstruction issues. It seems like they want a summary or more details. Limak, the Turkish contractor, faced delays and problems during redevelopment, which Laporta claims are not reasons for compensation. I should provide context, including timelines for demolition and the stadium's reopening, as well as some background on the issues reported, like cost overruns and neighbor complaints.Clarifying user intent for news summary

The user seems to want information related to the delayed return of Camp Nou and comments about Limak not being compensated. It’s confusing since they only provided a headline, and I’m unsure if they want more context or a rewritten summary. I should ask them a clarifying question, offering options for details, sources, or a rewrite. This way, I can provide a succinct summary while considering the implications of budget and schedule on the project.Summarizing Camp Nou reconstruction statement

I want to create a concise summary of Laporta's comments regarding the reconstruction problems at Camp Nou, emphasizing that Limak is not responsible for delays. I'll break this down into parts: a simple explanation, background on Limak and the project timeline, potential implications on budget and cash flow, and then provide options for the user. I’ll ask if they need a news brief, bullet points, translations, or a timeline. Keeping this clear and organized is key!